Lahore Bar Association moves SC against 27th Amendment following transfer of IHC judges

The Lahore Bar Association has approached the Supreme Court of Pakistan, challenging the 27th Constitutional Amendment in the wake of the recent transfer of Islamabad High Court (IHC) judges, intensifying the legal battle over controversial judicial reforms.

According to the petition, filed by senior lawyer Hamid Khan on behalf of the bar’s leadership, the association has urged the apex court to declare the amendment unconstitutional and of no legal effect. The move comes shortly after three IHC judges were transferred to other high courts following approval by the Judicial Commission of Pakistan and the presidency.

The petition argues that key changes introduced through the 27th Amendment—including alterations to Articles 175, 184(3), and 200—undermine the Constitution’s basic structure and erode judicial independence. It further contends that the removal of the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction to enforce fundamental rights is unconstitutional.

Lawyers have also raised concerns over the manner in which the judges’ transfers were carried out, alleging a lack of transparency, absence of clear criteria, and no demonstrated public interest. The petition claims such actions are arbitrary and legally flawed.

The legal community has widely criticized both the transfers and the constitutional amendments, warning that they could weaken the independence of the judiciary and disrupt institutional balance. Bar associations have signaled continued resistance, including protests and legal challenges.

Analysts say the case could have far-reaching implications, as the Supreme Court’s eventual ruling may shape the future of judicial authority and constitutional interpretation in Pakistan.